{"id":31984,"date":"2026-05-14T10:47:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-14T08:47:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/imaginadigital.com\/sin-categorizar\/claude-vs-chatgpt-why-at-imagina-we-use-claude-more-and-more\/"},"modified":"2026-05-14T10:47:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-14T08:47:11","slug":"claude-vs-chatgpt-why-at-imagina-we-use-claude-more-and-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/imaginadigital.com\/en\/blog-en\/claude-vs-chatgpt-why-at-imagina-we-use-claude-more-and-more\/","title":{"rendered":"Claude vs ChatGPT: why at Imagina we use Claude more and more"},"content":{"rendered":"

For a long time, ChatGPT was our main AI tool at Imagina. And it’s still very good. But after working with both platforms on real client projects, we have been using Claude more and more in certain tasks.<\/span>
\nNot because of a trend. For performance.<\/span>
\nThe difference is not only in generating text. It’s in how an AI handles context, coherence and operational work within a marketing and Social Media agency.<\/span><\/p>\n

In this comparison of Claude<\/a> vs ChatGPT<\/a><\/strong>, we explain why at Imagina we increasingly use Claude in strategy, content and documentation tasks.<\/p>\n

The problem we started to notice with ChatGPT<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

In an agency you don’t work with simple prompts. You work with:<\/span><\/p>\n